<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Auto-Responder Email replies: Ur doin it WRONG.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shankman.com/auto-responder-email-replies-u-iz-doin-it-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shankman.com/auto-responder-email-replies-u-iz-doin-it-wrong/</link>
	<description>CEO. Angel Investor. Entrepreneur. Adventurist.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:49:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Do You Really Have A Four Hour Work Week? - Brass Flowers UX/UI, design, and marketing blog</title>
		<link>http://shankman.com/auto-responder-email-replies-u-iz-doin-it-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-24221</link>
		<dc:creator>Do You Really Have A Four Hour Work Week? - Brass Flowers UX/UI, design, and marketing blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2011 12:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shankman.com/?p=1656#comment-24221</guid>
		<description>[...] Shankman, general cool dude, wrote a great blog post about how people are doing email autoresponders all wrong. Out of his list of five email autoresponder sins, the fifth one has to do with people [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Shankman, general cool dude, wrote a great blog post about how people are doing email autoresponders all wrong. Out of his list of five email autoresponder sins, the fifth one has to do with people [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://shankman.com/auto-responder-email-replies-u-iz-doin-it-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-24208</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 01:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shankman.com/?p=1656#comment-24208</guid>
		<description>My out of office pet peeve is &quot;I&#039;m out to lunch&quot;  or &quot;I&#039;m gone for the day&#039;&quot; -- You are out to lunch if you have to tell me that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My out of office pet peeve is &#8220;I&#8217;m out to lunch&#8221;  or &#8220;I&#8217;m gone for the day&#8217;&#8221; &#8212; You are out to lunch if you have to tell me that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Martell</title>
		<link>http://shankman.com/auto-responder-email-replies-u-iz-doin-it-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-24207</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Martell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 21:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shankman.com/?p=1656#comment-24207</guid>
		<description>In addition to the ones you&#039;ve noted, my pet peeve is the auto-response that assumes I&#039;m reading it immediately, or that I know who it&#039;s from, or anything else.  E.g., &quot;I&#039;m out of the office, returning Monday.&quot;  Great.  Very helpful.  And warm.  And professional.  Oops -- it&#039;s actually none of those.

How about something warm, professional AND useful?  Try:  &quot;Thanks for your email.  Unfortunately, I have limited (or no) access to email or voicemail until Monday, January 2, 2012, at 9am ET.  In an emergency, please call my assistant Nancy White @  (888) 555-1212 or email her @ nancywhite@fakemail.com.  Else, I&#039;ll respond as soon as possible upon my return.  Thanks again!  Happy New Year!

Jim Martell
Martell Security Consultants, LLC
(404) xxx-yyyy&quot;

Short, sweet, informative.  But not too much of any of the above.

By the way, if you electronically reveal that you&#039;re out of town, on vacation, etc., you&#039;re asking for trouble.  Why would you volunteer that kind of information to strangers?  Just say you don&#039;t have access, or that your access is limited, until whenever it won&#039;t be!  The person trying to reach you does not need to know that your home and family are vulnerable as you are not in the same area code until such-and-such.  Same goes for foursquare, trip-it, and similar apps on various online media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition to the ones you&#8217;ve noted, my pet peeve is the auto-response that assumes I&#8217;m reading it immediately, or that I know who it&#8217;s from, or anything else.  E.g., &#8220;I&#8217;m out of the office, returning Monday.&#8221;  Great.  Very helpful.  And warm.  And professional.  Oops &#8212; it&#8217;s actually none of those.</p>
<p>How about something warm, professional AND useful?  Try:  &#8220;Thanks for your email.  Unfortunately, I have limited (or no) access to email or voicemail until Monday, January 2, 2012, at 9am ET.  In an emergency, please call my assistant Nancy White @  (888) 555-1212 or email her @ <a href="mailto:nancywhite@fakemail.com">nancywhite@fakemail.com</a>.  Else, I&#8217;ll respond as soon as possible upon my return.  Thanks again!  Happy New Year!</p>
<p>Jim Martell<br />
Martell Security Consultants, LLC<br />
(404) xxx-yyyy&#8221;</p>
<p>Short, sweet, informative.  But not too much of any of the above.</p>
<p>By the way, if you electronically reveal that you&#8217;re out of town, on vacation, etc., you&#8217;re asking for trouble.  Why would you volunteer that kind of information to strangers?  Just say you don&#8217;t have access, or that your access is limited, until whenever it won&#8217;t be!  The person trying to reach you does not need to know that your home and family are vulnerable as you are not in the same area code until such-and-such.  Same goes for foursquare, trip-it, and similar apps on various online media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Miller</title>
		<link>http://shankman.com/auto-responder-email-replies-u-iz-doin-it-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-24206</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 19:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shankman.com/?p=1656#comment-24206</guid>
		<description>I am friggin&#039; in love with this post. I just got the &quot;I&#039;m on vacation and you&#039;re not you poor overworked schmuck&quot; auto-responder and now I feel like a loser at this holiday time and quess what, I just don&#039;t think that I need their marketing services after all! Sore loser. You betcha but hey, on my laptop, it&#039;s all about me:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am friggin&#8217; in love with this post. I just got the &#8220;I&#8217;m on vacation and you&#8217;re not you poor overworked schmuck&#8221; auto-responder and now I feel like a loser at this holiday time and quess what, I just don&#8217;t think that I need their marketing services after all! Sore loser. You betcha but hey, on my laptop, it&#8217;s all about me:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betsy Kent</title>
		<link>http://shankman.com/auto-responder-email-replies-u-iz-doin-it-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-24205</link>
		<dc:creator>Betsy Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 19:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shankman.com/?p=1656#comment-24205</guid>
		<description>Thanks for making me laugh. I hate them too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for making me laugh. I hate them too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

