<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Auto-Responder Email replies: Ur doin it WRONG.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shankman.com/auto-responder-email-replies-u-iz-doin-it-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shankman.com/auto-responder-email-replies-u-iz-doin-it-wrong/</link>
	<description>Entrepreneur. Adventurist.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:45:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adalia John</title>
		<link>http://shankman.com/auto-responder-email-replies-u-iz-doin-it-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-9713</link>
		<dc:creator>Adalia John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shankman.com/?p=1656#comment-9713</guid>
		<description>Well, I am now informed as to why I have been getting the same responses, each and every time I have sent an email to a few individuals. I am out of the office - I only check my mail twice a week. etc. WOW, unbelievable. Then they email me and want my business - sorry, no thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I am now informed as to why I have been getting the same responses, each and every time I have sent an email to a few individuals. I am out of the office &#8211; I only check my mail twice a week. etc. WOW, unbelievable. Then they email me and want my business &#8211; sorry, no thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Email Out of Office Etiquette? &#171; SullivanKreiss.com</title>
		<link>http://shankman.com/auto-responder-email-replies-u-iz-doin-it-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-9479</link>
		<dc:creator>Email Out of Office Etiquette? &#171; SullivanKreiss.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 16:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shankman.com/?p=1656#comment-9479</guid>
		<description>[...] Though they do serve a purpose, to let the sender know you are out and to not expect an immediate or timely response, there is (or should be) some rules.  Shankman includes the following (make sure you read the full article and explanations): [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Though they do serve a purpose, to let the sender know you are out and to not expect an immediate or timely response, there is (or should be) some rules.  Shankman includes the following (make sure you read the full article and explanations): [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by that_danielle</title>
		<link>http://shankman.com/auto-responder-email-replies-u-iz-doin-it-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-9461</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by that_danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 05:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shankman.com/?p=1656#comment-9461</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by that_danielle [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by that_danielle [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by DH</title>
		<link>http://shankman.com/auto-responder-email-replies-u-iz-doin-it-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-9459</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by DH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 02:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shankman.com/?p=1656#comment-9459</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by DH [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by DH [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR Cog</title>
		<link>http://shankman.com/auto-responder-email-replies-u-iz-doin-it-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-9441</link>
		<dc:creator>PR Cog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 05:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shankman.com/?p=1656#comment-9441</guid>
		<description>Am I allowed to disagree with nearly every point?

I&#039;ll leave out mocking of the 67 comments and RTs before me -- they&#039;re simply too .... well too much.

1) Most people don&#039;t understand their tech.  They likely don&#039;t know there are options.

2) Many people don&#039;t pick their own technology.  It&#039;s some IT guy in a basement and they simply don&#039;t have the options available to them -- their OOO (out of office) msg does Re:  Period -- no options.

3) The IT guy in the basement did not pick the technology his company based on how it deal with OOO msgs.  S/He picked it based on security, remote or web interfaces, user interface, integration with legacy systems or productivity software (Word processing, spreadsheets, etc.).  If OOO preferences were anywhere on the list they were last.

4) Peter, you really?  You don&#039;t care about your bud who&#039;ll be scuba diving for 2 weeks.  It gives you something to talk about on their return -- relationship building at its very best

5) I need the helpful maternity leave reminder -- you know what -- that item isn&#039;t making its way onto my calendar, particularly given the number of people who don&#039;t return to work following maternity leave b/c they&#039;ve decided to becomes stay at home moms or get better jobs while off.

6) The two times per day thing -- Blame T. Ferriss and the 4 hour workweek.  It&#039;s one of his techniques for time management.  And given that most people are willing to do what they&#039;re told to do it likely works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I allowed to disagree with nearly every point?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll leave out mocking of the 67 comments and RTs before me &#8212; they&#8217;re simply too &#8230;. well too much.</p>
<p>1) Most people don&#8217;t understand their tech.  They likely don&#8217;t know there are options.</p>
<p>2) Many people don&#8217;t pick their own technology.  It&#8217;s some IT guy in a basement and they simply don&#8217;t have the options available to them &#8212; their OOO (out of office) msg does Re:  Period &#8212; no options.</p>
<p>3) The IT guy in the basement did not pick the technology his company based on how it deal with OOO msgs.  S/He picked it based on security, remote or web interfaces, user interface, integration with legacy systems or productivity software (Word processing, spreadsheets, etc.).  If OOO preferences were anywhere on the list they were last.</p>
<p>4) Peter, you really?  You don&#8217;t care about your bud who&#8217;ll be scuba diving for 2 weeks.  It gives you something to talk about on their return &#8212; relationship building at its very best</p>
<p>5) I need the helpful maternity leave reminder &#8212; you know what &#8212; that item isn&#8217;t making its way onto my calendar, particularly given the number of people who don&#8217;t return to work following maternity leave b/c they&#8217;ve decided to becomes stay at home moms or get better jobs while off.</p>
<p>6) The two times per day thing &#8212; Blame T. Ferriss and the 4 hour workweek.  It&#8217;s one of his techniques for time management.  And given that most people are willing to do what they&#8217;re told to do it likely works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
