PETER SHANKMAN
| POSTED ON February 12th, 2009 | 54 COMMENTS | + ADD YOUR COMMENT |
Usually when I’m on The O’Reilly Factor, like I was last night, I get a bunch of “We hate you, we hope you die” emails. I’m used to them. Bill definitely has a varied audience, no doubt. I delete them without a second thought.
So imagine my surprise when I received a response from a HARO member, commenting on my appearance on the program last night. Simply copying and pasting what he said really wouldn’t do it justice – I actually had no choice but to take screen shots for posterity. Ready?

I thought it was a joke, also! So I emailed him back, and said this:

To which, our “Accomplished Communicator” (And keep in mind, I’m using that term as he uses it, directly from his website,) replies…

OK then! I kind of don’t know what to think. Not because I care what our “Accomplished Communicator” thinks about me, but rather, because I can’t figure out what would prompt someone to a) write that, b) write that and use their own name, and c) write that, use their own name, then think it was perfectly OK (and even give me permission!) to post it on a blog read by thousands of people?
I’ve been waiting to post this for a few minutes, staring at my email, waiting to see a follow-up email from Tony saying something like, “hey bro, I was just kidding, no offense,” or even “I’m jealous of you so I call you names…” Anything to justify why someone who runs an agency, that, according to the website, has worked with Coke, Ogilvy, KFC, GE, and others…
Hey, everyone’s entitled to their opinion. I’m sure there are people out there who think Kate Moss is fat, too! But still, I just can’t figure out what our friend Tony (again, who I’ve never met or interacted with) has to gain from this. Can anyone else? Because I’m stumped.
What do you guys think about Tony the Accomplished Communicator?
2009-02-12 – 8:08am EST: Edited to add: Some people have asked if his email was hijacked, and this was written without his permission… I’m not buying it for several reasons:
1) The email to which he responded makes no mention of my appearance on O’Reilly. He was responding to something he read earlier. Yes, the hijacker could have simply read last night’s HARO, then scrolled up to respond to this morning’s HARO. But… really?
2) Let’s say his email WAS hijacked. The email hijacker has nothing better to do than insult me? And comment on my theory on Kelloggs? There’s, I dunno – off the top of my head – PayPal, Amazon, eBay, online banking… “Emailing Peter” doesn’t seem high on the list of a potential email hijacker, right?
3) Assuming he does come back and say “Yeah, my emails were hijacked, someone emailed you from Russia with my account,” or whatever, I can simply look up the IP address of where they came from. That’s the easiest litmus test in the world.
Tony, if you’d like to respond, I’ll gladly print whatever you send to me, word for word. Again, I’m not pissed – I don’t know you at all – I have no reason to be pissed. I’m just so, so curious to find out why someone who’s obviously schooled in the art of communication (as based on the awards you list on your site) would go out of their way to insult someone with such a large following.
2009-02-12 – 8:26am EST: Edited to add: I attempted to call Tony on both numbers listed on his website. I got voice mail both times.
2009-02-12 – 9:40am EST: Edited to add: FINAL say on it: Tony contacted me on Facebook and apologized. He said he was attempting humor. What he didn’t realize was, a) there are better ways to go about it, and b) he hit a nerve. I think the lesson remains – be careful what you post. Email is forever, inflections don’t come across via email. Think before hitting send. I’m ok with moving on.
Tweet|
|
There’s a good rule about not blogging or Tweeting when drunk – perhaps this communicator missed that memo. |
|
|
Hey, even tools can be “accomplished communicators”. And tools rarely admit to being the kind who call people names because of jealousy. |
|
|
Tony the Accomplished Communicator? Heeeeee’s Grrrrrrreaat! No, not really, just kidding. Offense completely intended. |
|
|
I think I’ll email Tony. Just to see if s/he is really real. It has to be a joke or fake name for when someone wants to slam anonymously. Hmmmm. |
|
|
That’s certainly odd – but if his aim was not to make a joke, but to get your attention and drive traffic to his site… well, I’d say he’s succeeded! |
|
|
Stands for Doesn’t Understand Messaging Brother or Doesn’t Understand Media Bro. |
|
|
Either jelous of how you know how to rock the house Peter or just looking to plug Kelloggs. ;-) |
|
|
Or this is some elaborate plan by Peter and the A.C. to get the word out Tony’s company and create some buzz…. |
|
|
It’s not a smart idea because it’s NO FUN. I mean, Tony, REALLY. If you’re going to insult a guy who runs marathons and POSTS HIS TIME online, then be prepared to bring it. REALLY. And, REALLY? You’re going to take shots at a guy whose workout and training regimen has been curtailed because of injury? Really? Not to mention all the jet lag he accumulates faster than skymiles, you know, traveling the country, because people want to hear from someone successful. Really! And, REALLY: you’re think your email is going to mean much to a guy who jumps out of airplanes, willingly? REALLY? And, isn’t the point of insulting Peter that you’ll get that visceral reaction? Why not just call him on the phone? Let him tell you off, have a laugh, and build a relationship? REALLY! You want to know who comments about videos they see online? My dad. REALLY! He didn’t like my video, and he commented right there on the site. (and yes, that is really my dad.) You think like a 68-year-old man. REALLY! { this has been REALLY?! with Ike. } |
|
|
Maybe he still believes the adage that “all PR is good PR” even when you’re slamming someone who has the power to take you down? Bizarre indeed! |
|
|
I’m floored. This guy must be one of those “do as I say, not as I do” types. Not professional at all. |
|
|
Yikes, count one less visitor to his web site…I’m not adding to the spike. |
|
|
Accomplished Communicator…Meet KeyInfluencer. It amazes me that people who are supposed to be PR folk keep putting their feet in their mouths. |
|
|
As bad as Mr. Tortorici’s behavior was, I have to believe he was trying to be funny and has no idea just how he came across. That said, it doesn’t even come close to the recent interaction between a tech writer at the National Post and a marketing person. All of that was captured on Twitter: http://tr.im/npost1. That said, I hope that Mr. Tortorici handles his apology as well as the Post. http://tr.im/npost2. You’ve already been as graceful as @aprildunford. Keep us posted. |
|
|
Seriously? The guy had to be joking. Obviously jokes are better served for people that you know – but I can’t imagine anyone actually being that much of an idiot and meaning it… Then again… |
|
|
Brilliant that you put it out there. That’s really a bit of a head-scratcher. Maybe he wanted to get mentioned, but he looses professionalism points across the board. |
|
|
I figured out how to hit send on my email. I think that makes me an Accomplished Communicator, too. |
|
|
I’m sure it was a hard decision for Kellogg’s to make, but agree with you that they made a mistake. They’re just drawing negative attention to the brand by dropping him. Make a statement that says, “we disagree with his behavior, but he’s made a mistake and admitted to it and we respect that.” Personally, I think you sell more cereal with Phelps on the box. If the use of illegal drugs doesn’t keep you out of The White House, it shouldn’t keep you off a cereal box. Oh yeah, if you’re interested, you can still get your Michael Phelps Poster at: http://www2.kelloggs.com/Promo.....?PID=15596. I’m going to send off for mine today. |
|
|
So was he thinking you were going to write about it on your blog because it was funny??? Is that why agreed to the posting? |
PETER TO SPEAK
FOR THE NEWSLETTER




