<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Have Met the Enemy. And He is Us.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shankman.com/i-have-met-the-enemy-and-he-is-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shankman.com/i-have-met-the-enemy-and-he-is-us/</link>
	<description>CEO. Angel Investor. Entrepreneur. Adventurist.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:49:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Reporters Hate PR Professionals</title>
		<link>http://shankman.com/i-have-met-the-enemy-and-he-is-us/comment-page-1/#comment-23791</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Reporters Hate PR Professionals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 10:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shankman.com/i-have-met-the-enemy-and-he-is-us/#comment-23791</guid>
		<description>[...] Shankman recently told the story of how lazy/dumb/thoughtless PR types can be when he forwards a journalist request and gets mostly lame and irrelevant replies. His [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Shankman recently told the story of how lazy/dumb/thoughtless PR types can be when he forwards a journalist request and gets mostly lame and irrelevant replies. His [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan tynan</title>
		<link>http://shankman.com/i-have-met-the-enemy-and-he-is-us/comment-page-1/#comment-1691</link>
		<dc:creator>dan tynan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shankman.com/i-have-met-the-enemy-and-he-is-us/#comment-1691</guid>
		<description>and re: DK&#039;s statement.

all I can say is guilty, guilty, guilty. if not to you, then to dozens if not hundreds of pr folk out there. sometimes I get 100 responses to a query, especially on profnet. there is not time enough in the day to get back to everyone. so please let me apologize for my journalism brethren and sisterns as well.

dt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and re: DK&#8217;s statement.</p>
<p>all I can say is guilty, guilty, guilty. if not to you, then to dozens if not hundreds of pr folk out there. sometimes I get 100 responses to a query, especially on profnet. there is not time enough in the day to get back to everyone. so please let me apologize for my journalism brethren and sisterns as well.</p>
<p>dt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan tynan</title>
		<link>http://shankman.com/i-have-met-the-enemy-and-he-is-us/comment-page-1/#comment-1690</link>
		<dc:creator>dan tynan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 15:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shankman.com/i-have-met-the-enemy-and-he-is-us/#comment-1690</guid>
		<description>I posted this reponse a week ago, but it seems to not be here now, so I&#039;m trying again. - dt

I&#039;m a reporter, not a &quot;flack.&quot; And my immediate response is, what, this is news? Like this doesn&#039;t happen all the time? Two out of 18 is a poor batting average, but it&#039;s really not entirely out of the ballpark. Given the specificity of some of the queries I&#039;ve been seeing (&quot;I&#039;d like to speak to someone who was given a massage by a Romanian dwarf between June and August 2005, preferably of Italian descent&quot;) I&#039;m not at all surprised.

This is the way it is. You send out a query, and you get back mostly a lot of crap. Desperate PR people who see a keyword they recognize and leap on it like a hyena on a T-bone steak.

This is why I always ask people to respond to me via email only, so I can sift out the crap without having to get &#039;pitched&#039; over the phone. The really bad ones are the ones who are totally off topic and call you anyway, despite the &#039;email only please&#039; note.

OK, now you can bitch about journalists for a while.

peace out.

dan tynan
tynan on technology
www.dantynan.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted this reponse a week ago, but it seems to not be here now, so I&#8217;m trying again. &#8211; dt</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a reporter, not a &#8220;flack.&#8221; And my immediate response is, what, this is news? Like this doesn&#8217;t happen all the time? Two out of 18 is a poor batting average, but it&#8217;s really not entirely out of the ballpark. Given the specificity of some of the queries I&#8217;ve been seeing (&#8220;I&#8217;d like to speak to someone who was given a massage by a Romanian dwarf between June and August 2005, preferably of Italian descent&#8221;) I&#8217;m not at all surprised.</p>
<p>This is the way it is. You send out a query, and you get back mostly a lot of crap. Desperate PR people who see a keyword they recognize and leap on it like a hyena on a T-bone steak.</p>
<p>This is why I always ask people to respond to me via email only, so I can sift out the crap without having to get &#8216;pitched&#8217; over the phone. The really bad ones are the ones who are totally off topic and call you anyway, despite the &#8216;email only please&#8217; note.</p>
<p>OK, now you can bitch about journalists for a while.</p>
<p>peace out.</p>
<p>dan tynan<br />
tynan on technology<br />
<a href="http://www.dantynan.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dantynan.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DK</title>
		<link>http://shankman.com/i-have-met-the-enemy-and-he-is-us/comment-page-1/#comment-1687</link>
		<dc:creator>DK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 13:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shankman.com/i-have-met-the-enemy-and-he-is-us/#comment-1687</guid>
		<description>On the other hand, I did respond (directly) to one request, giving a brief outline of who I am and what my thoughts on the matter in question were.  No reply, not even an acknowledgement.  I know these people are busy, but a quick one-liner: &quot;Thanks, but I&#039;ve found enough sources for this one&quot; or similar wouldn&#039;t have gone amiss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the other hand, I did respond (directly) to one request, giving a brief outline of who I am and what my thoughts on the matter in question were.  No reply, not even an acknowledgement.  I know these people are busy, but a quick one-liner: &#8220;Thanks, but I&#8217;ve found enough sources for this one&#8221; or similar wouldn&#8217;t have gone amiss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://shankman.com/i-have-met-the-enemy-and-he-is-us/comment-page-1/#comment-1684</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shankman.com/i-have-met-the-enemy-and-he-is-us/#comment-1684</guid>
		<description>AMEN! but also *cringe*....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AMEN! but also *cringe*&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

