<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Four Ways to Get More Relevant-to-you Queries on Help A Reporter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://shankman.com/top-four-ways-to-get-more-relevant-to-you-queries-on-help-a-reporter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://shankman.com/top-four-ways-to-get-more-relevant-to-you-queries-on-help-a-reporter/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:48:13 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://shankman.com/top-four-ways-to-get-more-relevant-to-you-queries-on-help-a-reporter/comment-page-1/#comment-3754</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 17:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shankman.com/?p=916#comment-3754</guid>
		<description>http://www.chicagobusiness.com/cgi-bin/mag/article.pl?articleId=29944
case in point for your thoughts on #4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.chicagobusiness.com/cgi-bin/mag/article.pl?articleId=29944" rel="nofollow">http://www.chicagobusiness.com.....leId=29944</a><br />
case in point for your thoughts on #4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elicia Basoli</title>
		<link>http://shankman.com/top-four-ways-to-get-more-relevant-to-you-queries-on-help-a-reporter/comment-page-1/#comment-3752</link>
		<dc:creator>Elicia Basoli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 11:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shankman.com/?p=916#comment-3752</guid>
		<description>Great tips Peter! The only hurdle to #4 is that occasionally you&#039;ll get a client that doesn&#039;t like disclosing that type of personal information. They keep work and play 100% separate. That makes not only learning more about them challenging, but it often makes for an less-than-thrilling client/agency relationship. Totally agree, though, it helps to know more about who your working with!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great tips Peter! The only hurdle to #4 is that occasionally you&#8217;ll get a client that doesn&#8217;t like disclosing that type of personal information. They keep work and play 100% separate. That makes not only learning more about them challenging, but it often makes for an less-than-thrilling client/agency relationship. Totally agree, though, it helps to know more about who your working with!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Quenqua</title>
		<link>http://shankman.com/top-four-ways-to-get-more-relevant-to-you-queries-on-help-a-reporter/comment-page-1/#comment-3740</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Quenqua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shankman.com/?p=916#comment-3740</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know - as a reporter who&#039;s used HARO, I&#039;m not sure I like #2. If I share my contact info in an attempt to find sources for one story, it doesn&#039;t mean I want to be barraged with pitches for other stories--especially if you&#039;re trying to divine my beat based off a single inquiry. It&#039;s exactly that kind of junk that soured me on Profnet years ago. 

To be honest, I&#039;ve already had a few too many people responding to my first HARO request weeks after my deadline, which was clearly stated in my request. I for one would be hesitant to use HARO again if I though PR people were being encouraged to get creative with my contact info. 

Not trying to be a snob, just giving you the honest opinion of one reporter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know &#8211; as a reporter who&#8217;s used HARO, I&#8217;m not sure I like #2. If I share my contact info in an attempt to find sources for one story, it doesn&#8217;t mean I want to be barraged with pitches for other stories&#8211;especially if you&#8217;re trying to divine my beat based off a single inquiry. It&#8217;s exactly that kind of junk that soured me on Profnet years ago. </p>
<p>To be honest, I&#8217;ve already had a few too many people responding to my first HARO request weeks after my deadline, which was clearly stated in my request. I for one would be hesitant to use HARO again if I though PR people were being encouraged to get creative with my contact info. </p>
<p>Not trying to be a snob, just giving you the honest opinion of one reporter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kami Huyse</title>
		<link>http://shankman.com/top-four-ways-to-get-more-relevant-to-you-queries-on-help-a-reporter/comment-page-1/#comment-3739</link>
		<dc:creator>Kami Huyse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 19:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shankman.com/?p=916#comment-3739</guid>
		<description>I think that getting reporters that cover your beat to join and use HARO is probably the best one.  The fact that you deep 6 off topic pitchers should also give reporters a good feeling about using it.

But here is a new one for the list.  How about giving reporters leads even if it isn&#039;t for a client?  I have done this several times on HARO. The good news is that this gives you practice in non-promotional pitching (since it won&#039;t benefit you or a client directly) and it builds up goodwill with reporters who come to see you as a credible source of news.

Plus, it is just a nice thing to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that getting reporters that cover your beat to join and use HARO is probably the best one.  The fact that you deep 6 off topic pitchers should also give reporters a good feeling about using it.</p>
<p>But here is a new one for the list.  How about giving reporters leads even if it isn&#8217;t for a client?  I have done this several times on HARO. The good news is that this gives you practice in non-promotional pitching (since it won&#8217;t benefit you or a client directly) and it builds up goodwill with reporters who come to see you as a credible source of news.</p>
<p>Plus, it is just a nice thing to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzan French</title>
		<link>http://shankman.com/top-four-ways-to-get-more-relevant-to-you-queries-on-help-a-reporter/comment-page-1/#comment-3738</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzan French</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 19:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shankman.com/?p=916#comment-3738</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you and Allison: learn to be a better PR person or get more newsworthy clients.

This is why PR people are considered a necessary evil by some journalists (and I&#039;ve worked--still do--on both sides so don&#039;t blast me.) 

A) People are complaining about a FREE resource. FREE!
B) Journalists have chosen these stories and editors have approved them. Obviously they know what what their readers/viewers want and people on this list are going to take issue with that? Are you kidding?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you and Allison: learn to be a better PR person or get more newsworthy clients.</p>
<p>This is why PR people are considered a necessary evil by some journalists (and I&#8217;ve worked&#8211;still do&#8211;on both sides so don&#8217;t blast me.) </p>
<p>A) People are complaining about a FREE resource. FREE!<br />
B) Journalists have chosen these stories and editors have approved them. Obviously they know what what their readers/viewers want and people on this list are going to take issue with that? Are you kidding?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
